From d0d7a540b009433e4278f20def54b87edf3c712f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sadeep Madurange <sadeep@asciimx.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 11:15:17 +0800
Subject: RF lock.

---
 _site/log/fpm-door-lock-rf/index.html | 69 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

(limited to '_site/log/fpm-door-lock-rf/index.html')

diff --git a/_site/log/fpm-door-lock-rf/index.html b/_site/log/fpm-door-lock-rf/index.html
index c12d808..e2da50a 100644
--- a/_site/log/fpm-door-lock-rf/index.html
+++ b/_site/log/fpm-door-lock-rf/index.html
@@ -42,17 +42,29 @@
       <div class="container">
         <div class="container-2">
           <h2 class="center" id="title">FINGERPRINT DOOR LOCK (RF)</h2>
-          <h6 class="center">26 APRIL 2025</h5>
+          <h6 class="center">05 JUNE 2025</h5>
           <br>
-          <div class="twocol justify"><p>In 2023, I started tinkering with DIY electronics as a hobby. Until now, I’ve
-been using development boards like the Arduino Uno and ESP-32-WROOM so that I
-can focus on the software. Recently, I decided to step outside of my comfort
-zone and design a PCB from scratch for a door lock I’m working on.</p>
+          <div class="twocol justify"><p>Wanted to unlock door with fingerprint, wirelessly to avoid drilling.</p>
 
-<p>The lock comprises two subsystems: a fingerprint sensor in front of the door
-and a servo connected to the physical lock behind the door. The fingerprint
-sensor authenticates the person and signals the servo behind the door to unlock
-the door over an encrypted RF channel.</p>
+<p>2024-11: Started with basic 433MHz RF modules and two Arduinos. Connected data
+lines of the transceivers to UART RXD/TXD of an ATmega328P.
+Unreliable–constant packet loss.</p>
+
+<p>2025-01: Switched to RFM69 modules. A complete ball-ache. Followed the
+datasheet to the letter, audited code more than 30 times, cross-checked with
+RadioHead and RFM69 OSS drivers. No luck. ATmega328P runs at 5V, RFM69 3.3V. I
+suspect the problem is with the logic-level converter (LLC). Not enough swing.</p>
+
+<p>2025-04: Ditched RFM69s. Switched to NRF24L01+ modules–5V tolerant, no LLC
+required. Spent six weekends writing driver from scratch–clean-room, using
+datasheet. Works perfectly.</p>
+
+<p>2025-05: Wrote FPM sensor drivers for R503 and FPM10A. UART RX sequence was
+tricky–took multiple attempts to get handshake working. R503 has built-in LEDs
+and better form factor–will use it for the lock.</p>
+
+<p>2025-06: First PCB design. Two boards: fingerprint sensor (front), servo
+controller (back). Encrypted RF link between them.</p>
 
 <table style="border: none; width: 100%">
   <tr style="border: none;">
@@ -77,30 +89,21 @@ the door over an encrypted RF channel.</p>
   </tr>
 </table>
 
-<p>The PCBs have two layers. A copper region serves as the ground plane. The 0.3mm
-wide 1oz/ft<sup>2</sup> copper traces can carry up to 500mA (the tracks
-connecting the power source and the linear regulators have a width of 0.5mm).
-Both subsystems were functional. I was able to control the servo reliably using
-the fingerprint sensor.</p>
-
-<p>The designs aren’t without flaws, however. The main shortcoming of the circuits
-is that they draw significant amounts of quiescent currents despite employing
-sleep modes. The linear regulators were a poor choice as they dissipate too
-much heat. The fingerprint sensor and the servo draw 13.8mA (3.3V) and 4.6mA
-(5V) respectively, as long as they are connected to the power supply.</p>
-
-<p>Although the circuit didn’t draw more than 200mA without a load, the servo
-under load could draw up to 600mA. I’m sailing too close to the wind with 0.3mm
-copper traces. Instead, 0.4mm wide 2oz/ft<sup>2</sup> traces would have been
-safer.</p>
-
-<p>I’m working on improving the design to reduce idle current consumption and
-extend the battery life. Despite its deficiencies, this was my first PCB
-design, and I’m glad that it worked as well as it did. Custom PCB design marks
-an important milestone in my DIY electronics journey.</p>
-
-<p>Files: <a href="gerber_back.zip">gerber_back.zip</a>, <a href="gerber_front.zip">gerber_front.zip</a>,
-       <a href="source.tar.gz">source.tar.gz</a></p>
+<p>PCB specs: 2-layer, 1oz copper, 0.3mm traces (0.5mm for power). Ground plane.
+Both subsystems worked—could control servo from sensor over RF.</p>
+
+<p>Power problems became clear. Linear regulators dissipated too much heat. Sensor
+and servo drew 13.8mA and 4.6mA quiescent—unacceptable for battery. Servo
+inrush current can exceed 1A. Trace width (0.3mm), especially for servo and
+power, cutting it close.</p>
+
+<p>Verdict: Functional but not practical. Battery dead in under 24 hours. Led to
+<a href="../fpm-door-lock-lp/">complete redesign</a> with proper power management.</p>
+
+<p>Commit:
+<a href="https://git.asciimx.com/smart-home/commit/?id=f4b0b734a595919cf451ab9448b06274c8e609a4">f4b0b73</a>
+| Gerber: <a href="gerber_back.zip">gerber_back.zip</a>,
+<a href="gerber_front.zip">gerber_front.zip</a></p>
 </div>
           <p class="post-author right">by W. D. Sadeep Madurange</p>
         </div>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3