From 8be504601aeb9005b4e227fb2529d12672ea697e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sadeep Madurange Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 22:40:06 +0800 Subject: Tighten prose. --- _log/mosfet-switches.md | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to '_log/mosfet-switches.md') diff --git a/_log/mosfet-switches.md b/_log/mosfet-switches.md index 4fc1d31..bfe471a 100644 --- a/_log/mosfet-switches.md +++ b/_log/mosfet-switches.md @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ date: 2025-06-22 layout: post --- -Needed low-power switching for the [fingerprint door -lock](../fpm-door-lock-lp/). Servo and FPM draw high quiescent current--had to -cut power electronically during sleep. MOSFETs can do this. +Needed low-power switching for [fingerprint door lock](../fpm-door-lock-lp/). +Servo and FPM draw high quiescent currents--had to cut power electronically +during sleep. MOSFETs can do this. Schematics belong to Guide on BJT switches. ## Which topology? -MOSFETs preferred in professional work—more efficient when on. Harder to drive +MOSFETs preferred in professional work--more efficient when on. Harder to drive at 3.3V due to VGS requirements for full saturation (low RDS(on)). @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ N-channel: Lower on-resistance, cheaper, more efficient than P-channel. Harder to drive high-side (gate must be above source—requires extra circuitry like MOSFET drivers). -Used P-channel high-side for the door lock redesign. Simpler to drive from 3.3V +Used P-channel high-side for door lock redesign. Simpler to drive from 3.3V MCU, no driver needed. ## Further reading -- cgit v1.2.3